Ship audit-ready public sector software with code ownership

For agencies and service teams: build citizen services, regulatory, and operations workflows fast, with governance and traceability.

Modernize around case management, ERP, and data platforms without disrupting what is already live.

Where it runs

Hosting in Germany on Hetzner, EU on Azure, or on-premise; German DPA; subprocessor list published.

Integrations

APIs, webhooks, event streams, batch and SFTP.

Governance

Preview, test, production, approvals, audit trail, redeploy any version.

Ownership

Exportable source code. Eject to GitHub anytime.

Built for every public sector delivery model

Align scope, workflow ownership, and governance for the exact mission you operate in.

Citizen Services

Regulatory Agencies

Public Safety

Internal Operations

Public sector leaders are resetting delivery expectations

Independent benchmarks highlight why interoperability, governance, and predictable delivery matter now.

European Commission, eGovernment Benchmark 2025

Online is solved. Security is not.

93% of Single Digital Gateway procedures can be completed fully online, yet fewer than 1% of government websites pass all 13 basic security checks.

World Bank (GovTech Maturity Index)

A global benchmark for GovTech maturity

GTMI assesses GovTech maturity across 198 economies, covering core government systems, service delivery, citizen engagement, and cross-cutting enablers.

OECD (Digital Government Policy Framework)

What "mature digital government" requires

OECD frames digital government around user-driven services, open-by-default practices, government-as-a-platform, digital-by-design delivery, and data-driven operations.

What you can build across services, regulation, and operations

Deliver governed software around your systems of record, with review points, traceability, and code ownership.

Citizen services and case management

Permit and application intake

Capture intake data, route to the right team, and standardize case details before review and decision.

Benefits case workflow

Coordinate eligibility review, documentation, and approvals with clear handoffs and an auditable decision trail.

Constituent service workbench

Provide a unified view of requests, status updates, and next steps across teams and channels.

Regulatory and compliance

Inspection scheduling and follow-up

Route inspections, capture findings, and track remediation steps with traceable actions and approvals.

Licensing and renewal workflows

Track applications, missing documents, and approvals in a single governed flow with clear ownership.

Compliance exception management

Route flagged cases with traceable decisions, escalation paths, and oversight reporting.

Operations and grants

Procurement approvals

Coordinate approvals, thresholds, and notifications for procurement workflows with consistent controls.

Grant management workflows

Track applications, scoring, and award approvals with clear milestones and documented decisions.

Vendor and contract oversight

Track reviews, remediation tasks, and evidence across vendors with reporting and audit trails.

Fits your systems of record

Most ROI comes from removing manual handoffs and connecting to systems of record with clear ownership of every interface.

We integrate through REST APIs, webhooks, event streams, SFTP, batch files, and middleware so your case management, ERP, CAD, GIS, identity, and data platforms stay authoritative.

What we need from you

Integration patterns supported

Governed releases, stable production

Security and data controls for regulated teams

Each application runs its own backend, with a managed, encrypted Postgres per environment. Single-tenant infrastructure and BYOC on Enterprise.

RBAC, audit logs, and monitoring keep access controlled. Your workspace content is not used to train models, and deployment options (managed single tenant or BYOC) are available for Enterprise customers.

Security controls in practice

What a first public sector pilot looks like

We align on a focused workflow and deliver reviewable increments with clear governance.

Scope, acceptance criteria, integration plan

Pick one workflow, define measurable success criteria, map interfaces, and capture governance, retention, and accessibility requirements.

Build the first workflow slice, preview review

Deliver a reviewable slice in preview with clear approvals and traceability for stakeholder input.

Integration and hardening, test environment

Connect systems of record and validate flows in test with monitoring, audit visibility, and redeploy of any earlier release.

Security gate, production release or controlled rollout

Security gate, sign-off, production release. Every release stays redeployable.

Success criteria examples

Procurement and security reviews stay predictable

We align early on evidence needs, deployment model, and operating boundaries so approvals do not stall delivery.

Typical artifacts we provide

What we align up front

Public Sector FAQ

Answers tailored to public sector delivery, integration realities, and oversight needs.

Do you train models on citizen or agency data?

No. Your workspace content, including your data and your code, is not used to train models. Customer workspaces are isolated from each other. Access is limited to what is needed to operate the service and support you.

Can we deploy in our own cloud (BYOC) for data residency?

Yes. Nuclicore-managed apps run on Azure in the EU or Hetzner in Germany, each with its own backend and a managed Postgres per environment. You can also run in your own AWS, Azure or GCP account (BYOC), or on dedicated single-tenant infrastructure on Enterprise. In BYOC, your network controls, keys and secrets stay in your cloud boundary.

How do you integrate with legacy systems and mainframes?

We integrate using the interfaces you already have: REST APIs, webhooks, event streams, and, where needed, batch and SFTP. We also fit common public sector patterns like API gateways, middleware, and integration hubs so systems of record remain authoritative and change stays predictable.

How do you support compliance, audit, and oversight needs?

Work is organized into reviewable tasks with acceptance criteria. Releases move through preview, test, and production with approval gates, and any earlier release can be redeployed. Changes are traceable, and actions are captured in audit logs so teams can review what changed, when, and why.

How do you handle accessibility and public records requirements?

We treat accessibility, records retention, and export needs as first-class acceptance criteria and review checkpoints. We align upfront on what must be logged, retained, and retrievable, and we design workflows so oversight teams can trace decisions and produce evidence efficiently.

Who owns the code and can we export it to GitHub?

You own the code generated for your application. Nuclicore produces standard, portable code and supports exporting the full repository to your GitHub so your engineering team can review, extend, and operate it independently.

How do updates, bug fixes, and change requests work after launch?

You submit changes as new tasks, with scope and acceptance criteria reviewed before implementation. You review working software in preview, then promote through test to production with approvals. This keeps changes controlled and reduces the risk of breaking what is already live.

What does a first pilot look like for an agency?

A typical pilot starts with one high-impact workflow, for example permit intake, inspections, grant management, procurement approvals, or case coordination. Week 1 locks scope, evidence needs, and acceptance criteria. Weeks 2-3 deliver reviewable increments and integration. Week 4 focuses on security review, hardening, and a controlled production rollout.

What security review artifacts can you provide?

We can provide an architecture overview and data flow, environment and deployment model details, access control and audit log behavior, and outputs from security scanning and remediation processes where applicable. We align early with your security team on required evidence and review steps. We also provide the nightly ZAP scan reports and the automated dependency audit from each release.

How do you ensure changes do not break what is already live?

We separate preview, test, and production environments and promote changes through them with approvals. The workflow is task-based and reviewable, and any earlier release can be redeployed. This reduces uncontrolled changes and keeps production stable while you iterate.

We serve several agencies or municipalities. Do we need several applications?

No. Deployment labels run one application for several municipalities or departments, each under its own domain, with separate secrets, branding and database schema.

Turn public sector backlogs into running software.

Ship faster with governance, security controls, and code ownership.